The information about the students who are graduate and postgraduate in the United Kingdom and not work in any fully-featured jobs in 2008 is depicted by the rendered bar charts. The data has been calibrated in the number of students.
To begin with, 17735 graduate students preferred half-time jobs. However, the proportion of pupils who were continued studying, which was 29665 students. There were 16235 graduate students who were jobless. Moreover, only 3500 students after completing college they were doing some voluntary activities.
Moving towards, the number of pupils who were working in temporary jobs and who were doing advance studies, it accounted for 2535 and 2725 respectively. In 2008, only 345 people were participating in any kinds of charity work after graduation. However, there were 1625 students who could not able to find any kinds of jobs in the UK.
To sum up, it can be vividly manifested that the most pupils preferred to doing further study who were postgraduate or graduates. In contrast, fewer students were interested in voluntary service.
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 61
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think that the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 73
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Is it a positive or negative development 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, in contrast, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28488372093 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80887370633 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587209302326 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9634284982 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6363636364 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6363636364 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201951121391 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085110377723 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478096371399 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129873804557 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364543657882 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.