the charts below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013
The graph illustrated the number of persons who eat fast food at eating house in united state between 2003 and 2013
In general, it can be seen that the most people eat fast food one time a week in 2003 and 2006. While in 2013 the people who eat precooked food once or twice times a month reaches a peak.
To begin with the year two thousands and thirteen, it can be observed that the rate of people who eat once time every day stood at 4% approximately. Then the percentage rose significantly to around 17% for persons who eat many times weekly. For people who one time a week, the rate increased suddenly to more than 30% (around 31%). Whereas, the proportion went down to around 5% for people who do not eat fast food in restaurant.
Turning to 2006, it can be witnessed that, the proportion is around 3% for people who eat every day. This rate was more than that in 2003. The per cent of people who once a week was approximately 33% which is higher than the rate in 2003 for this group. However, the proportion declined sharply to around 4% for persons who never ever eat fast food in restaurant.
Finally, in 2013, the people who eat unhealthy food every week still the same rate (3%). While the percentage increased markedly to 15% for people who eat fast food a few times a year before grew down to around 4% for persons who never eat fast food.
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groupsand the amount of support they received from employers. 73
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where releva 61
- in a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Other believe the mony should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discus both thes 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement? 61
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...state between 2003 and 2013 In general, it can be seen that the most people eat ...
^^^
Line 2, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... or twice times a month reaches a peak. To begin with the year two thousands and...
^^^
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a one'.
Suggestion: who is a one
...s who eat many times weekly. For people who one time a week, the rate increased suddenl...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... The per cent of people who once a week was approximately 33% which is higher th...
^^
Line 4, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...However, the proportion declined sharply to around 4% for persons who never ever ...
^^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people who eat unhealthy food every week still the same rate 3%. While the perce...
^^^
Line 5, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...healthy food every week still the same rate 3%. While the percentage increased ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, so, still, then, whereas, while, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 3.15609756098 539% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1100.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.34782608696 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29856765617 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450592885375 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9090608147 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6666666667 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172166744837 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883909634318 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612857603369 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14306652216 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484129678748 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.95 11.4140731707 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.61 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.