The bar chart describes the export commodity for its earning in five different types of products in one country between 2015 to 2016, while the table illustrates the change of the total value of export commodities over a 1-year period.
Overall, four from five commodities had increased earning for 1 year period. Textile commodities had the highest change in earning, while gems and jewelry dropped to a significant number.
The highest-earning from 5 categories of commodities was a petroleum product. This was also hit at about 60 billion for a year. Similarly, the second largest earning was engineered goods at around more than 60 billion. Furthermore, for the other three categories, this earning was just under 40 billion.
On the other hand, textiles were the most commodities that had the largest change up to 15.24%, followed by engineered goods just below about 3% at 8.5%. Petroleum and agricultural products grew just about below 3%. On the other hand, gems and jewelry products declined significantly at 5.18%.
- In some countries criminal trials are shown on television for the public Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- In most of the countries number of plants and animal species are declining What is causing this What can we do to change the situation 87
- The pie chart below shows where energy is used in a typical Australian household and the table shows the amount of eletricity used according to the number of occupants Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 73
- Some people think that paying tax is their only duty while others believe that we have more responsibilities towards society Discuss both view and give your opinion 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their was 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, second, similarly, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22891566265 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86853275836 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584337349398 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.1839055648 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114660683014 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414799811288 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747923342682 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0823585850315 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101266148797 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.