the charts show the number of marriages and divorces in the USA, 1970-2000 and Marital status of adults Americans, 1970 and 2000.
The first bar chart illustrates how many Americans were married and divorced over a 30-year period from 1970 and 2000 while the second bar chart shows figures for the marital status of adult Americans in 1970 and 2000.
Overall, it is obvious that there was an upward trend in the number of marriages between 1970 to 2000. Most of adult Americans were married 1970. Having remained stable in 1980, the number of marriages fell slightly, reaching around 2.3 million in 1990, and followed by a marginal decline to 2 million in 2000. In contrast, the level of divorces reached a peak at nearly 1.5 million in 1980, Then the figure can be seen a fall to 1 million as the same as that in the first year in 2000.
Approximately 70% of adult Americans were married in 1970, then fell by around one-tenth of that number. Regarding unmarried and divorced status, the proportions rose by nearly 10% in 2000. There was a lower number of windowed Americans in 2000 compared to that in 1970.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-31 | bechir sekrafi | 78 | view |
| 2017-08-26 | Huyen Trang | 73 | view |
| 2017-08-26 | Huyen Trang | 73 | view |
| 2017-08-26 | Huyen Trang | 73 | view |
| 2017-08-26 | Huyen Trang | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the level of participation in education and science in developing countries and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 73
- the graph below shows information about consumption of spreads from 1989 to 2007. summarise information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The charts below show the level of participation in education and science in developing countries and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 73
- the graph below shows information about consumption of spreads from 1989 to 2007. summarise information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- the expenditure on fast food by income groups, UK 1990. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, regarding, second, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 807.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63793103448 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42970263237 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540229885057 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9031818295 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.875 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.476535327678 0.215688989381 221% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.209991149151 0.103423049105 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966622375212 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.341796854924 0.15604864568 219% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523865969168 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.