The charts depict the prevalence of a host of mediums by which individuals can keep themselves well-informed and give information on the level of people's trustability in connection with those sources of news.
Overall, people put their trust in local television news the most, whereas online-only news websites seem to be the least reliable. Additionally, in terms of ubiquity of news sources, local news showed on TV were also in the top tier with its percentage reaching 80% mark, nevertheless, newsreaders were not in favor of magazines for getting day-to-day information with only negligibly 40% used.
As per the chart, besides local news, national networks and radio news are those of the most trusted sources to keep people from living under the rock with merely 50% each. However, the number of people who do not trust the former is approximately 5% higher than that of the latter. In addition, newspapers equalized radio news in terms of distrust as both received a 10% for that matter.
About the news sources used, national networks and newspapers were used somewhere in the vicinity of 70%. Furthermore, radio news, online-only sources, and magazines had a difference of nearly 10% with nearly 60%, 50%, and 40%, respectively,
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- The pie charts and table gives information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000 79
- What are the advantages and disadvantages for children of watching television Discuss both sides 78
- The table below gives information on internet use in six categories by age group Describe the information in the table and make comparisons where appropriate 87
- The maps give information about a university sports court 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17821782178 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88830735561 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613861386139 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4275209981 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.75 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.625 5.23603664747 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188551610929 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848155053198 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446946490974 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118481168592 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036090048495 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.