The figure reveals cases of cars stolen from 1990 until 1999 in four nations. It is clearly seen that theft was prevalent in Great Britain compared to other areas.
In 1990, Great Britain had 17,000 recorded stolen automobiles and this rose up to 20,000 in 1992 but had a decrease after a year with 16,000. After 3 years, the number of vehicle thefts steadily grew until it reached its peak in 1993 with 21,000 then, it plummeted in 1999 with only 15, 000 cases. Subsequently, Sweden was the 2nd leading country with high cases of car thefts though it started with only 8,000, it skyrocketed up to 13,000 in 1996 and plateaued until 1998. It rose a year after with 14,000.
France and Canada on the other had almost the same pattern. Their theft cases begun with 6,000 to 7,000 respectively and declined after 3 years with almost a thousand difference from the starting point. France, however , fell down until 1990 while Canada increased steadily until the end period reaching a little over 5,000.
- Consumption of Fast Food by Australian teenagers 11
- Comparison of car theft 84
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- The bar chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...from the starting point. France, however , fell down until 1990 while Canada incre...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77011494253 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27401290539 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632183908046 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4600625159 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2222222222 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107851836585 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523067555838 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509204803463 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941953011367 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486384111024 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.