The diagram below gives information about the number of parcels delivered by two major mail services companies from 1920 to 2000

The line graph illustrates how many good was delivered by Federal Express and TNT Mail Services between 1920 and 2000.
Overall, There was an upward trend in the figure for TNT Mail Services delivering , while the opposite is true for Federal Express.
Concerning of the number from 1920 to 1960, the figure for FedEx delivering in 1920 was over 15 thousand, making it was triple to the figure of TNT. Besides, delivering by FedEx witnessed a significant increase of 9 thousand, which hit a peak in 1940 before this figure experienced a dramatic drop in 1960. Similarly, A gradual rise of 3 thousand was seen in the number of TNT delivering that was equal to the number of FedEx in 1960.
Regarding of the change in over next years, A remarkable rise was seen in the number of FedEx, then this figure dropped slightly from 18 thousand to 17 thousand. By contrast, there was a significant rise in the delivering by TNT although this company experienced a slow decrease from 1960 to 1980, which surpassing the number of FedEx to become the largest of delivering.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun good seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much good', 'a good deal of good'.
Suggestion: much good; a good deal of good
The line graph illustrates how many good was delivered by Federal Express and TN...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 82, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... figure for TNT Mail Services delivering , while the opposite is true for Federal ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, regarding, similarly, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74594594595 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67998754059 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513513513514 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2055140072 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.428571429 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184350577122 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104946925291 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488566799828 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13044705373 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345784394941 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.