The diagram presents the evolution of a horse which mainly happens on the structure of its foot. Overall, the evolution along with the change in the horse’s name and body commenced about 40 million years ago. It is obvious that over time, the foot structure becomes thicker and higher.
Forty million years earlier, a horse was called an eohippus, which was a mini-scale one compared with a modern horse. An eohippus’s foot was constructed by small bones and nails which became bigger and stronger in the next 10 million years when its name changed to Mesohippus.
In the following 15 million years, the Mesohippus was then named Merychippus. A merychippus has a medium foot structure with shorter nails and middle finger in comparison with a mesohippus. Additionally, a meryhippus was also taller in height and bigger in shape. In the modern world, this feature is finally called a horse, which has a round-shape and high-heel-liked foot structure as well as a much more robust body.
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 78
- Many people are working longer hours Why is this happening What problems can this cause to people 73
- The graph below shows the US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t structure becomes thicker and higher. Forty million years earlier, a horse was...
^^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: taller
...us. Additionally, a meryhippus was also taller in height and bigger in shape. In the modern wor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: bigger
...eryhippus was also taller in height and bigger in shape. In the modern world, this feature is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, so, then, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01818181818 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84012959003 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593939393939 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5104717907 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322030012087 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136221796383 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0997726451011 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240120267354 0.15604864568 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146183372654 0.0819641961636 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.