The pie chart delivers statistics of youngsters' main drive for using smartphones, measured in percentage, from 2016 to 2019. The reasons included is using social platforms, sending email, taking digital photos and making phone calls.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that social networks accounts for the most proportion throughout the given period. Surprisingly, teenagers using their phones for phone calls was the least relevant case.
At the beginning of the period, a half of young people used their electronic devices because of social networks. This number had a small dip in 2017 but increased in the following years until reached its peak at 56% at the end of the period. In contrast, phone calls stood at 10% in 2016 then slightly increased to 13% until significantly dropped to 5% in 2019.
Other primary means such as taking photos experienced an upward trend, but a slow rate. This proportion added up to 4% in 4 years. Interestingly, email witnessed an opposite trend with camera figures, which is a drop of 6%.
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 84
- Some people believe that in order to improve educational quality we should encourage students to make comments or even criticism of their teachers but others think it will lead to the loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and 73
- Some people believe that in order to improve educational quality we should encourage students to make comments or even criticism of their teachers but others think it will lead to the loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and 73
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, then, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1091954023 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76962007312 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689655172414 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0016666152 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0395990564188 0.215688989381 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.015068664916 0.103423049105 15% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302003170855 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0244844038478 0.15604864568 16% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244909838666 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.