The bar charts above graph the statistic in fast food purchase across residents of the United Kingdom with different economical status in the late 20s century. Overall, it is notable that the most in demand product is hamburger, bought mostly by the high and average income group, while fish and chips is slightly preferred by the people from lower working class.
The high income groups, as expected, rank first in total amount of money spent on fast food meal, with the total of 83 millions pounds across all element. Moreover, hamburger makes up more than half of the sum, followed by pizza and chips which are roughly similar. The average middle class citizens, while not as interested in hamburger as the rich, still spend a respective 34 millions pounds.
As a matter of fact, people from lower salary tend to shift their predilection toward fish and chips, evidenced by the fact that they are in top demanded by the low income group, and is bought higher than the upper class by the middle class. Pizza seem to be the lest favored commodities, being the lowest in total number, and is the lowest to be bargained for aside from the privileged citizen.
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 80
- Your friend is thinking about learning to drive and would like some advice Write a letter to your friend In your letter Say why a driving license is advantageous recommend a driving school give any extra guidance tips 91
- the expenditure on fast food by income groups UK 1990 78
- Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies factories and their employees to the countryside Do you agree or disagree 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ts of the United Kingdom with different economical status in the late 20s century. Overall...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, still, while, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79104477612 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33037714909 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606965174129 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.1215222461 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.571428571 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7142857143 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141739520089 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056697065954 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524992086981 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943859538391 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035886521694 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.