The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period.
The graphs illustrated information about average monthly spending on children's sports by British parents and how many children played football, swimming, and athletics showed by millions from 2008 to 2014. A glance at the drawing makes it clear that money spending is increased year by year moreover football was popular among the children.
Looking at the first graph, even though, British parents spent 20 pounds on children's activity initially in 2008, it constantly increased next years. The money consumption was still constantly raising the next years by almost 10 pounds. Lastly, in 2014, expenditure on youth's activity by the parents was expanded reaches 32 pounds in one month.
In the second chart, however junior soccers made up the highest amount, it slightly grew by 1 million throughout the whole period. On the contrary, although athletic players were only 1 million in 2010, it dramatically rose up by 4 million within 2 years. While there were almost 2 million swimmers in 2008, participators steadily rose to 4 million at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | Mei1312 | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-31 | my220904 | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-15 | khangoccho | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-13 | felixchen | view |
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on cunstructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport 56
- Percentage of UK people who consumed the daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002 2006 and 2010
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Percentage of UK people who consumed the daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002 2006 and 2010
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 270, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'youths'' or 'youth's'?
Suggestion: youths'; youth's
...pounds. Lastly, in 2014, expenditure on youths activity by the parents was expanded re...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, lastly, look, moreover, second, so, still, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15606936416 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68795450146 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647398843931 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8364793332 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241154316859 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930766783854 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838221629397 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14944486348 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684388508869 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.