The two pie charts illustrate the proportion of energy categorized by different items and their contributions to greenhouse exhaust in Australia.
It is apparent that although heating and water heating accounted for the highest energy in use, other household functions, which were not in vogue, emitted the most greenhouse gas. Besides, the figure for water heating was dominant in both charts.
Moving to a more detailed analysis, heating occupied the highest percentage, at 42%, followed by water heating, at 30%. Those led to energy used for heating being three-quarters of all and made others insignificant. However, heating, in general, accounted for under 50%, with 15% for heating and 32% for water heating.
According to the pie chart, in the rest items, only the data about other appliances were 15%, others were less than 10%, with the lowest proportion seen in cooling, at a mere 2%. In contrast, those produced more than 50% of total greenhouse gas. In addition, other appliances remain the highest, at 28%.
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Italy Sweden Portugal between 1967 and 2007 56
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- the graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph shows the percentage of visiting the cinema once a month or more between 1984 to 2000 4 age groups Summarise the information and make comparisons where relevant 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, in addition, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7727918522 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612121212121 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4272188841 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115973060947 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523916898411 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057991522711 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816074956287 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379800941657 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, in addition, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7727918522 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612121212121 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4272188841 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115973060947 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523916898411 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057991522711 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816074956287 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379800941657 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.