The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995.
Given are the two pie charts illustrating the questionnaire about tendency adults did in the spare time between 1985 and 1995.
It is clear that people set aside almost time watching TV in 1985. By contrast, doing other activities was the category receiving the least expenditure in 1995.
To embark on, people were consumed with watching TV in both years, at 32% and 30% respectively, while, time for talking with family in 1985 (18%) was higher than in 1995 (7%). However, adults tended to talk with friends, at 26% in 1995 and in 1985 was lower, at 21%.
While eating out in 1985 occupied 23%, the figure in 1995 was only 8%. In comparison to watching TV, there was a mere minority of added activities experienced in two years, at not over 6%. A noticeable fact is the appearance of playing computer games in 1995 and this hobby accounted for 27% of the total group.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-23 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-20 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-08 | Drake004 | 30 | view |
| 2021-06-08 | Drake004 | 47 | view |
| 2021-04-19 | Sherzod Parakhatov | 78 | view |
- In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 56
- The graph below shows the change in the proportion of GDP in three areas in a particular country between 2000 and 2020. 56
- In recent years the proportion of crimes committed by youngsters is on the rise and families are solely responsible for this trend Do you agree or disagree with the above statement 69
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 73
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. Do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two pie charts illustrating the que...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 720.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64516129032 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52476598683 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.645161290323 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 201.6 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2429740409 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186703202139 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877159250908 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593366931732 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129639328764 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605164529193 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.