GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010
The bar chart gives information about yearly Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth in three countries along 4 years started from 2007 to 2010. There were 3 countries that will be figured out specifically Tunisia, Japan, and Ecuador. Overall, as can be seen that the most positive movement was dramatically happened to be in Japan whilst the most declined country was in Tunisia obviously.
Regarding to the data, country which the most sharply grew had to be in Japan, it was incrementally rose from 2% in 2007 to 4% in 2008. The next 2 years after that it was rising up to 6,5% in 2010. Tunisa’s GDP growth was totally different to Japan’s expansion, the trend inclined to drop down gradually from around 6,3% in 2007 to 4,5% in 2008 and keep down from that year it was also decreased in 2010 as many as 1,5% approximately.
On the other hand, the GDP progress of Ecuador in along 4 years was such as a period of volatility. The trends were exactly such as a fluctuating expansion. It began from 2% in 2007 and progressed in 2008 which went up to around 4,9%. Unlikely, in 2009 it was sharply dipped down to 1,3%. Then it was rising up to 2,3% in 2010 as the last fluctuation evidence.
- Global sales of games software, CDs, and DVD or Video 89
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems 73
- Before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 73
- the sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday 67
- Preferred leisure activities of Australian children 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'risen'.
Suggestion: risen
...ad to be in Japan, it was incrementally rose from 2% in 2007 to 4% in 2008. The next...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, then, as to, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57674418605 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69315579864 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553488372093 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.2565765878 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4545454545 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5454545455 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250928085848 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987104236272 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105338447022 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182833994324 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636011112957 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.