The given line graph illustrates clients average every year spending on mobile phone national and international land line and services

Essay topics:

The given line graph illustrates clients' average every year spending on mobile phone, national and international land line and services.

The given line graph illustrates clients' average every year spending on mobile phone, national and international land line and services.

From basic observation, the number of mobile phone services and international fixed-line services improved remarkably by contrast, the number of national fixed-line services declined significant from 2001 to 2010.

Starting at $700, the number domestic land line was the most spending on mobile phone, following by the international fixed-line services, and the lowest is the national land line in 2001. The number national fixed-line services slipped steadily back $200 from 2001 to 2006. There was a significant increase of $300 in the international land line services from 2001 to 2006. Before leading remarkably, from 2001 to 2006, the number of mobile phone services reached a plateau.

With a reference to the number of the cell phone and domestic land line services have to $500 and the number of international land line services have to $300 in 2006. The number of mobile phone services touched the highest point between 2006 to 2010. The number of national land line witnessed a significant decrease of 100 from 2006 to 2010. The number of international fixed-line services did not change from 2006 to 2010.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-01-10 Giang Tran 73 view
2023-01-10 Giang Tran 78 view
2023-01-16 Giang Tran 78 view
2023-01-10 Giang Tran 67 view
2023-01-10 Giang Tran 67 view
Essays by user Giang Tran :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 340, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...cant decrease of 100 from 2006 to 2010. The number of international fixed-line serv...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1056.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87504782569 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.38 0.547539520022 69% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7729177571 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.6 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.2 5.23603664747 4% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.517845169571 0.215688989381 240% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.281871192588 0.103423049105 273% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.219824844013 0.0843802449381 261% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.452116902564 0.15604864568 290% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.257441056882 0.0819641961636 314% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.