The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line diagram projects the data about international tourists arrivals in various continents (like north America, south America, South-East Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, Central, and Eastern Europe) over a 15 years period. At a glance, the number of international tourist arrivals in all these parts of the world had increased in 2005.

Looking closer to the graph, in 1990, North America had significantly large number of international tourist arrivals (approximately 70 million) which remained highest even after 15 years. Moreover, travelers in central and eastern Europe had inclined by almost 200 percent nearly meeting the data of north America.

Moving into the details, south-east Asia had third largest international tourists arrivals from 1990 to 2005. Nevertheless, the tourists who arrived in south America and sub-Saharan Africa were not only equal in 1990 but also were among least travelled tourism area.

In summation, large number of the international tourist had arrived in north America and least in south America during the year 2005.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-25 Shivam7090 56 view
2019-11-21 Spring2019 73 view
2019-11-18 hung253 56 view
2019-11-18 lyvvu 61 view
2019-11-03 Anbill 56 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user biraj bhandari :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'remained the highest'.
Suggestion: remained the highest
...arrivals approximately 70 million which remained highest even after 15 years. Moreover, traveler...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'among the least'.
Suggestion: among the least
...re not only equal in 1990 but also were among least travelled tourism area. In summation...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, third

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58385093168 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83527956842 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590062111801 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.526589213 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.428571429 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138579249006 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811827327918 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482876435826 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977684721699 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332404381377 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.