The graph below gives information about internet users in three countries between 1999 and 2009.
The line graph compares the differences in the number of Internet users in three nations namely the USA, Canada, and Mexico during a 10-year-period between 1999 and 2009.
Overall, as can be seen from the chart that the proportion of people using the Internet increased generally in the three countries surveyed. Particularly, Canada had the largest number of Internet users among three. Units are measured in percentages.
In 1999, Canada only had around 10% of citizens using the Internet, while the figure for American was approximately 10% higher than the former. Then, both two figures rose significantly and the percentage of Internet users in the USA was taken up by that of Canada in 2003. Canada’s figure was followed by the USA’s to reach the peak at around 100% and 80% respectively.
Meanwhile, the number of Internet users in Mexico witnessed a gradual upward trend during the time shown, at about 3% in 1999, then it increased to nearly 30% before surging to approximately 35% in the end.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-06 | luckydough55 | 52 | view |
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The main purpose of a public library is to provide books, and they shouldn’t waste the limited resources and space on providing expensive hi-tech media such as computer software, video, and DVDs.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statemen 73
- The chart below shows the annual pay thousands of US dollars for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004 77
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09523809524 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86187603979 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4894791021 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269480514997 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110273737768 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0913880829196 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173829785017 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082461096998 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.