The graph below show the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007

Essay topics:

The graph below show the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007.

The line graph illustrates, ingestion of margarine low fat and reduced spreads and butter over 27 years between 1981 and 2007. Units are measured in grams.
Overall, butter experienced a downward trend while low fat and reduced spreads have showed an upward trend and margarine was fluctuating in over the period given.
At the beginning of the period in 1981, butter was consumed 140grams but it reached to peak level which was 160grams in 1986 before it decline dramatically to 50 grams in 2007. The quantity of margarine intake was round about 90 grams in the start though it dropped after 5 years to 80 grams. In 1991 it was on the top which was 100 grams and it remained stable for the coming 5 years but till the final year it was plunged down to 40 grams.
The consumption of low fat and reduced spread start in 1996 which was approximately 10 grams. This figure, reached to a high level in the next five years which was over 80grams well ahead, it slightly decreased to almost 70 grams in 2007.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-12-11 Giang Tran 73 view
2024-12-11 Giang Tran 73 view
2024-12-11 Giang Tran 73 view
2024-12-11 Giang Tran 73 view
2024-12-09 Estriper view
Essays by user Niizam :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... till the final year it was plunged down to 40 grams. The consumption of low fat...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, well, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56906077348 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40755959697 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546961325967 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9244735313 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.375 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14238215901 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067540800288 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710104827854 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105179843933 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592946876976 0.0819641961636 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.