The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005.

The line graph gives detailed information about how much money spent on purchasing books, recorded in million dollars, in four different countries between 1995 and 2005. Looking more closely at the chart, it is obvious from the data that expenditure on books in all of the countries had an upward trend over the period.

According to the chart, the books were the most bought in Germany starting at 80 million dollars in 1995. There was a fluctuation on books sold in this period and ended up at approximately 95 million dollars in 2005. However, Austria people were the least interested in books at the beginning at 30 millions, but there was a dramatically increase in the last 5 years from 40 to above 70 millions.

Spending money on books in Italy and France was about 50 and 55 million dollars at the first year of this period respectively. By 2005, there was a rise of 20 millions to 75 millions in France. Similarly, Italy's expenditure on the books climbed up to over 60 million dollars, yet they became the least buying books country instead of Austria at the end of the period.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... spent on purchasing books, recorded in million dollars, in four different countries be...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...m the data that expenditure on books in all of the countries had an upward trend over the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...beginning at 30 millions, but there was a dramatically increase in the last 5 years from 40 to above 70...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, similarly, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69270833333 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60969725222 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578125 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2455953772 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.625 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21413972819 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987930694751 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515891381912 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150876994113 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333590471371 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.