The given line graph compares the average of daily expenditure which spent by three groups of New Zealand visitors between 1997 and 2017.
Overall, New Zealand travelers spent the highest amount of daily expenses from 1997 to 2005. Moreover, visitors who saw their friends and relatives spent the least amount of money over the given period.
At first, in 1997, business travelers daily cost was about $ 250 that rose to nearly $330 in 2002 which was the maximum reported number. Afterwards, it decreased dramatically by $150 in 2005 and it had a period of fluctuation over the next 12 years.
It is noteworthy that friends or relative visitors spent nearly $110 in 1997 which was the minimum amount of spending from 1997 to 2017. Both of the vacation and friends or relatives figures had an upward trend over the following 7 years. Unlike the business figure, they had a steady decline in 2005 which was followed by a constantly changes over the $200 and $140 respectively.
- DO you agree or disagree that technology has made students less creative than in past? 60
- The graph below shows the average daily spend of three categories of international visitor to New Zealand from 1997 to 2017. 56
- Do you agree or disagree computer games is waste of time and children should not be allowed to play 80
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 61
- Students leave high school without a good understanding of how to manage money. What do you think are the reasons? And give some possible solutions for this problem. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$250'.
Suggestion: $250
...business travelers daily cost was about $ 250 that rose to nearly 30 in 2002 which wa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 813.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89759036145 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53410173963 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578313253012 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 17.0715406452 43.030603864 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.625 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253837354488 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119113156051 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13880004492 0.0843802449381 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181381089372 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130919269115 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.