The chart compares 3 different means of transport in terms of daily users in the UK over a period of 60 years.
It is clear from the graph that car by far is the most popular type of transport in England during the period shown. Additionally, the numbers of people who use car and train on a daily basis increase gradually, while the figure for bus declines steadily.
In 1970, there were around 5 million UK people traveled by car daily, while the figures for bus and train were relatively lower, at 4 million and 2 million users respectively. By 2010, the number of Uk commuters traveled by car had risen to 7 million people, compared to 3 million train users. By contrast, Bus's figure decreased by 0,5 million to 3,5 million users perday in 2010.
By 2030, it is predicted that the number of people driving to work reach 9 million, whereas the number of train users is projected to rise, to nearly 5 million. At the same time, the figure for bus is likely to decline to around 3 million travelers daily.
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 84
- In many countries people now wear Western clothes suits jeans rather than the traditional clothing Why Is this a positive or negative development 87
- The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006. 73
- Ielts writing task 1 11
- The figure gives information about smoking habit of the UK population by age Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...to 3,5 million users perday in 2010. By 2030, it is predicted that the number o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52173913043 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48435558733 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54347826087 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0344622819 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227812498616 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106687944785 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694959599875 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129867728806 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555185170687 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.