This line graph illustrates the percentages of household income spent on different categories for an interval of 50 years starting from 1965.
In 1965, savings was the largest distribution shown in the chart. There was a slight initial decline until 1990. After that, the number dropped dramatically and in 2015, people saved less than 5% of their household income. Accommodation started as the second highest allocation, at more than 10%. Similar to savings, the proportion fell slowly for the first twenty years but after that, it started to increase significantly and eventually reached the peak of more than 15% in the year 2005.
All four categories including recreation, food, transport, gas and electricity saw a slight upward trend in the distribution of household income. Only gas and electricity began to rise in the year 2005. Finally, spending on home improvements was negligible until 1990. The figure, however, started to increase continually and finished at about 2.5% at the end of the period.
To sum up, all the categories finished at higher level in 2015 than it was in 1965. The sole exception is savings.
- This chart below shows the percentage of the city's population that does not have any sort of health insurance. there is information from 1981 to 2005 for two cities 73
- Q: Without capital punishment our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 84
- The bar chart below illustrates the use of tobacco products by secondary school students in the United States 81
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at about 2.5% at the end of the period. To sum up, all the categories finished a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13586956522 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88270521676 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614130434783 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.6626366835 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.75 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3333333333 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0938741037513 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0333493884504 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417844767395 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0655906953213 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308825141701 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.94 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.