The given line graph illustrates the amount of fish and 3 popular kinds of meat, namely chicken, beef, and lamb, in a particular country in Europe from 1979 to 2004
Overall, it is highlighted that during a period of 25 years while the consumption of chicken experienced an upward trend, the opposite was true for the remaining subjects. Meanwhile, the amount of fish consumed by citizens ranked the bottom place in this meat list.
According to the data, the year 1979 witnessed the domination of beef in the portion of people in a European country, with about 220 grams per week. The second and the third position were lamb and chicken, at 150 and 140 grams per week, respectively. Over a 25-year period, the consumption of chicken completely overwhelmingly changed, which became the most preferred meat at the end of the period, with 250 grams. In contrast, consumers had a tendency to eat less beef and lamb, these figures gradually decreased and only accounted for a half in comparison with the initial figures.
Regarding fish, a modest reduction was recorded in fish consumption, from 60 grams per week in 1979 to 45 grams per week in 2004.
- Competitiveness is considered to be a positive quality among people How does competitiveness affect individuals Is competitiveness a positive or negative quality 84
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- One of the most important issues facing the world today is a shortage of food and some think genetically modified foods are a possible solution To what extent do you agree or disagree
- The charts below give information about world spending and population Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 11
- Many historic buildings are being destroyed or replaced What are the reasons for this What should be done to preserve these buildings 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...week. The second and the third position were lamb and chicken, at 150 and 140 grams ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, second, so, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85279187817 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72425723256 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624365482234 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.9938235944 43.030603864 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.571428571 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1428571429 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155519632012 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673094775863 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331085774031 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100870878151 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479673580424 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.