The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.

The line graph illustrates the amount of consumed fish and various meat, which include chicken, beef and lamb, in the country of European from 1979 to 2004.
It can be clearly seen that fish was the least depletion over the period. Overall, while the number of chicken was increased, fish and other meat are also decreased.
In 1979, beef was the highest depletion at 225 grams per person per week, the lamb was followed by 150 grams, which was higher than chicken lightly by 10 grams, and fish depleted 60 grams at the beginning.
During the years, there is a sharp increase of chicken until 1989, it transcended lamb after 2 years crossing at 150 grams and became the most popular at 200 grams in 1989 and kept raising at 250 until 2004, while beef declined dramatically to 100 grams eventually. 100 grams was decreased from the lamb finally and a soft decline was recorded on fish depletion by 15 grams to 45 grams.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 760.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63414634146 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32668097907 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 203.4 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.5574104731 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.666666667 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0905437409131 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624077008508 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657946681915 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0812989404619 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733301948719 0.0819641961636 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 77.91 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.