The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004
The line chart provided illustrates how many grams of four different type of meats ware consumed by people in a Europe nation in a week from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, it is evident that the number of consumption of three types of meat (chicken, beef, and lamp) experienced a fluctuation, while the trend of fish was slightly changed.
Generally, fish was the only kind of meat that does not experience a fluctuation trend during the period. In the initial year, it stood at just above 50 grams and ending the time with just below 50 grams.
beef, on the other hand, started the period as the highest figure (just above 200 grams). From 1979 and 1984, the number fluctuated and then remain stable at around 235 grams between 1985 and 1987. Following that, the consumption of beef exponentially decreased to about 100 grams at the end of the reported year. Lamb, however, revealed exponentially changed during the period. it stood at 150 grams in 1979 and decreased to almost threefold at the end of the period.
In 1979, the chicken was not a popular kind of meat consumed in a European country. it accounted much smaller (80 grams) compare to beef when the period started. however, between 1979 and 1989, the figure of chicken increased gradually and surpassed the figure of beef in 1990, accounted for around 210 grams. Afterward, the number of consumed chicken fluctuated and reached the highest figure at around 260 grams in the 2000s, and ending the period with 250 grams.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- Some people get into debt by buying things they don’t need and can’t afford. What are the reasons for this behaviour? What action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem? 73
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other type of progress are equally important for a country.Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Beef
...ing the time with just below 50 grams. beef, on the other hand, started the period ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 377, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...xponentially changed during the period. it stood at 150 grams in 1979 and decrease...
^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...of meat consumed in a European country. it accounted much smaller 80 grams compare...
^^
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ompare to beef when the period started. however, between 1979 and 1989, the figure of c...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, while, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1218.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77647058824 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49268055774 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505882352941 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4028663334 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6923076923 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172342957979 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651434114551 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650547196378 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102758179585 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244793792873 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.