The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas

The line chart illustrates the figure for wheat exported in three different regions (Australia, Canada, and the European Community) between 1985 and 1990. Units are measured in millions of tonnes.
Overall, the three graphs of wheat exports each show a different pattern. Meanwhile, wheat exports from Australia decreased gently, Canada fluctuated significantly and the European Community indicates a steady growth over the given period.
According to survey data, Canada had the highest amount of wheat exported in the first 4-years. It began at around 19, then peaked at 25 in 1988, before hitting a free fall to under 15 in 1989 and finally increasing again to 19 in 1990.
In comparison with the export of wheat in Australia, which witnessed a slight climb to around 16 in 1986, the quantity in the European Community dropped gently to 14 at this time. After that, exports from the European Community went through a period of dramatic increases to over 20 in 1990, surpassing the number in Canada and becoming the country that had the most wheat export in all three. On the other hand, Australia's figure decreased slowly throughout 1986, then reached a plateau of 11 from 1989 to 1990.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...lly increasing again to 19 in 1990. In comparison with the export of wheat in Australia, ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, so, then, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01515151515 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57704958683 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2445119013 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281566094727 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132518769598 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156878898264 0.0843802449381 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191196959831 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12298194519 0.0819641961636 150% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.