The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarise information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Submitted by Vo Long on Wed, 12/19/2018 - 05:13

The presented bar graph compares the amount of emission released into the air from four different main sources between the years 1990 to 2005.
Overall, the total number of air pollutants gradually decline over the period shown. This is the same trend with the industrial figure, by contrast, transport and household were responsible remained the constant in the fifteen periods.
To be more specific, in 1990, approximately 7 million air contaminants emitted by these sources had the enormous record through 15 years, with the largest index belonged to industrial action with roughly 6 million tons. And, the toxic gases production of households and transport demonstrated the same number, under 1 million each.
From that time onward, the fewer air contaminants discharged into the air, with total figure had an amazing decline about 4 million at the end of the period, more than a half air pollution has been enumerated. Similarly, industrial emission significantly decreased until the year 1996 and continuously downstream the figure stable, around 2 million at the end. While there was a little growth of commutation which was an unworthy record, almost remained the same after 15 years. Households had done a great job, it approximately disappeared out of the comparative table shown.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ources between the years 1990 to 2005. Overall, the total number of air polluta...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d the constant in the fifteen periods. To be more specific, in 1990, approximat...
^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'gases'' or 'gas's'?
Suggestion: gases'; gas's
... roughly 6 million tons. And, the toxic gases production of households and transport ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the same number, under 1 million each. From that time onward, the fewer air con...
^^
Line 4, column 579, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...red out of the comparative table shown.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32195121951 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87087157999 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658536585366 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1221648619 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.222222222 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138002104542 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563912354617 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823457533851 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105185907718 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0905253975407 0.0819641961636 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.