The graph below shows the number of complaints made about noise to Environmental Health authorities in the city of Newton between 1980 and 1996.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line chart illustrates the proportion of complaints caused by noise from four different public activities affected to environmental health authorities in the city of Newton from the year 1980 to 1996. In overview, road works was reported to have a decline in complaining reports, while three others, traffic noise, factories, and domestic/household experienced upward trends in the numbers of complaints.

In more details, in 1980, road works became the most noisy factor to Environmental Health authorities in Newton, surveyed at above 600 complaints, and then it underwent a dramatic decrease at about 50 complaints in 1996, being the least noise source among others. Meanwhile, two other noise factors, traffic noise and household, were recorded to have similar patterns with different details in the numbers of complaints. It was shown that both had stable numbers from 1980 to 1984, and experienced a slight decrease in 1986, further had sharp rises in 1996 at 600 complaints of traffic noise, and above 1200 complaints of domestic, being the highest numbers among others. In another side, factory noise was surveyed to have a little increase from 400 complaints in 1980 to above 600 complaints in 1996.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1025.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31088082902 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93706983772 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554404145078 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.1239500325 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.833333333 112.824112599 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1666666667 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239725884141 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125814306005 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602313706697 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198624541822 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00584815295524 0.0819641961636 7% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.2329268293 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.11 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.