The given line chart illustrates the number of international tourists visiting three distinct types of regions in a particular European nation over twenty years starting from 1987 and ending in 2007.
Overall, coastal zones attracted the most travellers from overseas to this country while the lakes’ figure was the lowest among the three different areas. In addition, there was an upward trend in the three objects of this linear diagram throughout the period.
Coastal areas gained a large number of 40,000 people in 1987. Over the next five years, its figure gradually plummeted to 35,000. After that, the coast’s line began to go up and reached a peak at 75,000 in 2007. The mountainous regions also saw a marginal increase in the number of foreigners which fluctuated around 20,000 and 30,000 over the first fifteen years of the period. In the end, the mountains peaked at approximately 35,000 international travellers.
Starting at 10,000 in 1987, the number of foreign travellers to the lakes in this European nation steadily rose over the first fifteen years and reached its highest point at 75,000 in 2002. During the remaining years, the lakes suddenly saw a sharp fall in international tourists and stood at 50,000 in 2007.
- The diagram shows the process by which sheep embryis are cloned 67
- The diagram shows the process by which sheep embryis are cloned 74
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions from 1980 to 2010 73
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 73
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ghout the period. Coastal areas gained a large number of 40,000 people in 1987. Over the next fi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, while, as to, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12807881773 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61146009863 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56157635468 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6604562247 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.1 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16954032621 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688383728613 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060022764011 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110973496969 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369791248886 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.