The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart illustrates the proportion of exports from Australia to 4 various countries over a 22-year period.
Overall, while the figures for Australian exports to the US and China followed an upward trend over the period shown, there is an overall decrease in the rate of the other countries. Besides, the share of exports from Australia to China showed the biggest change of all the 4 countries.
In 1990, Australian exports to Japan accounted for around 26%, more than double the figure for the US, at about 12%. Over the next 22 years, the share of Japan imports from Australia experienced a gradual decrease to approximately 18 in 2005, before remaining stable from 2005 to 2012. In the meantime, the percentage of imports into the US from Australia underwent a wild fluctuation, falling to around 6% in 2012.
Turning to the other categories, initiating at about 2% in 1990, the rate of Australian exports to China significantly increased by 26% from 1990 to 2012. The period from 2005 to 2010 marks the point at which China became the major export market. Meanwhile, the period from 1990 to 2012 witnessed an increase in the figure for India imports from Australia to 5% in 2012, after staying constant at 1% between 1990 and 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-02 | dieulinhhhh | view | |
| 2023-09-02 | dieulinhhhh | view | |
| 2023-07-30 | TLan168 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-23 | thaoduong1902 | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-08 | NguyenVanAnh | view |
- Essay 5 Some people say that schools should concentrate on teaching students academic subjects that will be used for their future careers Other people say that subjects such as music and sports are also necessary Discuss both views and give your own opini 95
- The line graph below shows the number of international conferences in three cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009 73
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 84
- The maps show the changes of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84976525822 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65480400528 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516431924883 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7482380186 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.777777778 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214466847764 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103752751644 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405499102568 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134416855022 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394458090899 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.