The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph shows two air pollutions(sulphur dioxide and smoke) average levels in London between 1600 and 2000. Units are measured in micrograms per cubic meter.
Overall, it is clear that the levels of sulphur dioxide and smoke had a similar pattern during this period, but there were always higher level of sulphur dioxide than the level of smoke in the atmosphere. They were both minimal in 1600. However, they grow dramatically and reach a peak in about 1900. After this, they fell sharply to almost disappear by 2000.
Looking at the information in more detail, we can see that sulphur dioxide reach a peak of nearly 900 micrograms per cubic meter in 1850, while the pollution level of smoke up to 400 micrograms per cubic meter.
Over the next one hundred year, these two pollutions experienced an inclined period and finally be got rid of, although there were a great deal of fluctuation between 1925 and 1960.
- The diagram below shows the production of electricity using a system called Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC).Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 84
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 61
- Social media is becoming increasingly popular amongst all age groups. However, sharing personal information on social media websites does have risks.Do you think that the advantages of social media outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views 67
- The table shows the percentages of mobile phone owners using various mobile phone features. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 760.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84076433121 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53243793932 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649681528662 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 69.5475332057 43.030603864 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160395648053 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704808194296 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866926449168 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103976608735 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723678551325 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.