The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the line graph contrasting the rate of four distinct materials which were recycled in an undefined country during a period of 28 years, commencing from 1982.
Percertibly, the percentage of all materials used for recycle experienced a similar soaring trend in which paper and cardboard was by far the highest in comparison to the others.
Leaping from 65 percent in 1982 to 70% in 1996, the rate of paper and cardboard deflated in the next 5 years before returning to 65% in 1990. Thereafter, it surged exponentially to 80% in 1994; however, the last 7 years witnessed a sharp slump in the rate with only 70% recorded in 2010.
When it comes to that of glass containers recycled, it diminished from 50% in 1982 to 40% in 1990, followed by a period of a sharp surge to the original number within 5 years, commencing 1990 to 1994. This figure still continued to rise slightly to 60 % in 2010.
Strikingly, the aluminum cans began to be used for recycling in 1986; however, its percentage swelled from the starting point at 5% to peak around 45% in the last year in 2010. While plastics were not used as recyclable materials until 1990 ( no plastics were used as recyclable material before the year 1990), this figure witnessed a slow rise with the percentage only 9% reported in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-05 | HappyCandy | 89 | view |
| 2022-02-05 | HappyCandy | 89 | view |
- The charts give information about world forest in five different regions
- The maps below show the changes in an Art Centre from 2010 to today 76
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- In developing countries children in rural communities have less access to education Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and Inte 89
- The diagram illustrates how bees produce honey Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... used as recyclable materials until 1990 no plastics were used as recyclable mate...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, still, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69162995595 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68424994238 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568281938326 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.5940076157 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.125 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.375 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198507777525 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845151420667 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629556381696 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110945045137 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647609679869 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.