The line graph represents a differentiation of the population of people whose age over 65 from 1940 to 2040 in three different countries.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that at the beginning, the USA had the most age over 65 people, while at the end less than all other countries. The opposite trend was observed in the case of Japan.
According to the graph, in 1940, the US had the highest amount of people (8%) who has aged more than 65, while Japan had the least percent 5%, and Sweden just 1% above Japan. Over the next two decades the amount rose moderately, both in the USA and Sweden it increased 2%, however, in Japan, the portion decreased to 3% and until 1990, it remained the same. Moreover, from 1960 till to 1983 for both USA and Sweden the percent climbed up parallel and stood at 15 and 13 percent respectively.
In Japan, from 1990 to 2030, the percentage slowly grew from 3 to 10%, after that, within 10 years the value rapidly raised to approximately 27%. Turning to the USA it decreased continuously to 13% before the last 20 years then climbed up to 23%. In the case of Sweden, the percentage decreases and increases over time and ends at 25%.
- Do you think it is better for students to work before their university study Why Use reasons and specific examples to support your choice 73
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 14
- Some people believe that bicycles are the best mode of transport in the cities while others disagree Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both views and give your opinion 84
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places 84
- The chart below shows information about the challenges people face when they go to live in other countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51162790698 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49402097356 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590697674419 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3220322748 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.777777778 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130026870245 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059907367011 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925723117081 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114350359052 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111512297157 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.