The line chart illustrates the amount of goods transported in the UK from 1974 to 2004 by four mean of transports. Overall, during this period, the quantities of merchandises transported by road, water and pipeline experienced an upward trend while the amount of goods transported by rail remained unchanged.
During this long period from 1974 to 2002, the quantities of goods transported by road was always the largest number. In 1975, there were around 70 million tonnes of good transported by road and this number remained stable until 1990s when it witnessed a long period of upward trend in this number from 1990 to 2002. Similar to road, the amount of goods transported by water rose significantly from 1974 to 1982. Afterward, this number remained unchanged during a long period between 1982 and 1998 before it started to grow again from 1998 to 2002. A strong upward trend could be found in the amount of goods that was transported by pipeline between 1974 and 1982. After that, this figure remained stable for a long period from 1982 to 2002.
By contrast, the quantities of merchandises transported by train witnessed a downward trend from 40 million tonnes in 1974 to around 30 million tonnes in 1986. This figure was stable between 1986 and 1990 before it started to show an upward trend from 1994. In 2002, the amount of goods transported by train came back to where it started with 40 million tonnes per year.
- The diagram below shows a possible future means of home energy production Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagram below shows the stages in the recycling of aluminium drinks cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 75
- Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion 61
- The diagram below show how glass container such as bottles are produce and recycled 73
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2018 and future projections for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 33.7804878049 178% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1184.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85245901639 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.567746422 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.405737704918 0.547539520022 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.695167062 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.636363636 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.818181818182 5.23603664747 16% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200353022744 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105976130181 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502410347124 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161487965686 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028615973082 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.35 8.06136585366 79% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.