The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
The graph compares how many goods the four different types of transport could carry in the UK from 1974 to 2002. Overall, the quantities of items transported by the four modes increased as a whole in the twenty-eight years.
Starting with 1974, road was the most popular transport mode among the four, delivering the goods of nearly 70 million tonnes. Rail and water transmitted the similar number of goods (around 40 million tonnes). Pipeline played the smallest part in carrying products—just around 5 million tonnes.
Turning now to the period of twenty-eight years, the quantities of goods transported by road, water, and pipeline showed an upward trend, arriving at approximately 100, 65, and 23 million tonnes respectively by 2002. In contrast, meanwhile, the amount of commodities by rail fluctuated slightly. It remained stable until 1978, when it began to decline and in 1995 fell to the lowest point at approximately 25 million tonnes. Then, it rose to around 41 million tonnes in 2002.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 78
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
- Some people say the best way for the government to solve traffic congestion is to provide public transportation 24 hours a day and 7 days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14110429448 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8770586056 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61963190184 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6196546406 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1111111111 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333820974699 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129059615192 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139025300718 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252811660886 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.165843499702 0.0819641961636 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.