The chart compares about coffee production in 4 different nations (Brazil, Colombia, Indonesia and Vietnam) between 1990 and 2010.
In general, it can be seen that for all figures the trend was upward expect for Colombia. Additionally, the coffee production in Brazil was the highest, while Vietnam had the lowest production according to the chart.
Turning to the chart for details, the amount of coffee producedin Brazil started at 0.7 million tonnes in the first year, compared to Colombia’s 0.6 million tonnes. In the last year, the figure for Brazil’s coffee production increased significantly before reaching a peak of 1.9 million tonnes. In contrast, there was a considerable fall in the production of coffee in Colombia, which hit the lowest point about 0.3 million tonnes.
Looking at the others, Indonesia produced nearly 0.2 million tonnes in 1990, which was double that of Vietnam’s production (0.1 million tonnes). In the next 5 years, these figures for Indonesia and Vietnam remained relatively unchanged before growing significantly, reaching 0.4 million tonnes and 0.3 million tonnes respectively.
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 78
- The charts give information about world forests in five different regions 73
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Internet access helps young people and workers achieve their education and work goals more easily than before To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...duction of coffee in Colombia, which hit the lowest point about 0.3 million tonne...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47976878613 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8452226963 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549132947977 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.7476634494 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169712075366 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998558145748 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981755150457 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142181556208 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107270909703 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.