The graph shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the average emission of carbon dioxide per person in four countries, namely United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal, from1967 to 2007. Overall, through the surveyed period, the carbon dioxide emitted by the UK and Sweden generally declined, while a reverse trend can be viewed in Italy and Portugal.
First of all, the UK emitted the most CO2 (roughly 11 metric tonnes) in 1967. This figure steadily decreased to 9 metric tonnes over four decades even though it still produced the most CO2 in the four measured countries. The CO2 emissions in Sweden took the second place. Its figure started at 9 metric tonnes in 1967, and then gradually rose to 10.5 metric tonnes before continually dropping to the bottom at 5.5 metric tonnes in 2007.
By contrast, the CO2 emissions in Italy began at just over 4 metric tonnes in 1967, after that the figure gradually went up and exceeded the Sweden statistic after 1987. Thereafter, it grew mildly and levelled off at 7.5 metric tonnes. Similarly, Portugal also generated more carbon dioxide during the measured period, which started at 1 metric tonnes and ended up at the same figure with Sweden at 5.5 metric tonnes in 2007.
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992.Summarise the informatioin by selecting and reportin the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 73
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 59
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 71
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 93
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
no serious flaws found.
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 202 200
No. of Characters: 966 1000
No. of Different Words: 107 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.77 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.782 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.276 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 85 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 43 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 29 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 14 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.444 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.084 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.464 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.647 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.14 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, second, similarly, so, still, then, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92574257426 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3681224878 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549504950495 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7192115786 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.555555556 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176812118602 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901519415182 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107525652209 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149832095965 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108574666554 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.