The graph compares six different energy sources which have been consumed in the US since 1980 and projected consumption to 2030. The units are measured in Quadrillion.
Overall, fossil fuels have historically been the largest major energy source for total annual U.S energy consumption, accouning for more than 80% of total energy consumotion. Estimation shows that this trend will continue until 2030.
In 1980, consumption of petrol and oil was 35q, which was equal about 40% of total U.S. consumption. This figure decreased by 5q in 1985, before rising to 40q in 2017. Prediction estimates that oil reach 50q in 2030. The condition for coal and natural are similar to oil by initial difference. At the first of given period, coal and gas were consumed 15q and 20q respectively. After five years, both met at 17q, rising to 25q in 2017, then gas remain stable whereas coal rise by 5q in 2030.
Nuclear, solar/wind, and Hydropower started at same point, about 4q in 1980, making up only 20% of U.S consumption. Nuclear consumption rose steady and reached 7q. In contrast, Hydropower had fallen by 1q while solar has been remained in start point.A significant increase have not seen in this categoty,with Renewable source and nuclear rise but can not reach even 10q in last year.
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century. So protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree agree? 84
- The graph shows consumption of energy in the U S since 1980 with projections through 2030 78
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 11
- the graph shows the number of cases of X disease in Someland between 1960 and 1995 61
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
... major energy source for total annual U.S energy consumption, accouning for more ...
^
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...out 4q in 1980, making up only 20% of U.S consumption. Nuclear consumption rose s...
^
Line 7, column 251, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
... solar has been remained in start point.A significant increase have not seen in t...
^
Line 7, column 304, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , with
... increase have not seen in this categoty,with Renewable source and nuclear rise but ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ease have not seen in this categoty,with Renewable source and nuclear rise but ca...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, then, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1076.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00465116279 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68173317221 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646511627907 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.2435881398 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7692307692 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5384615385 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07692307692 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241780683823 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730755659119 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100088782243 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158374583406 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115811219151 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.