The line graph illustrates the annual changes in the income of certain bakeries in Calgary from 2000 to 2010.
Generally, the earnings for Mari Bakeshop, Amandine Bakery and Bolo Cakery experienced a downward and an upward trend. Regarding the first, Mari bakeshop’s sales were down over the decade. It had significant fluctuations over the first half of the period, followed by an extreme fall and levelled out at a precise 40.000.
By contrast, the sales for the other bakeshops grew significantly over the decade. Although the earnings for Amandine Bakery remained unchanged until 2005, it increased gradually from under 60.000 to about 70.000 by 2007. After that, it rocketed to 99.000 ending the period up with over 100.000. Furthermore, Bolo Cakery’s income fluctuated insignificantly and then doubled by 2003. Afterwards, it remained unchanged until 2006, when it rocketed and continued a gradual growth to over 60.000.
Overall, the sales for Amandine Bakery and Bolo Cakery reached a higher volume of income than Mari Bakeshop which was the most profitable in the beginning of the ten-year period.
- increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.to what extent do you agree or disagree?what other measures do you think might be effective? 73
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in Calgary 2000 2010 78
- the chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some believe that modern technology is increasing the gap between rich and poor people, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, regarding, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32954545455 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78249026344 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619318181818 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8050310486 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137429803183 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590194633633 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10658308962 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121218638451 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135898409101 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.