The graph shows the employment rates of men and women in the UK in 2008
The bar charts illustrate the proportion of employment rates of both genders by age group and by the age of their youngest child in the UK in 2008. Overall, what stands out from the graph is that employment rates of males almost surpassed that of females in both graphs, except for 16-17 and over 60 year-old groups by their age that bucked the trend.
In particular, when it comes to employment rates by age, the graph witnessed the highest numbers in 25-49 year-old group with about 90% for males, compared to approximately 75% for females, followed by 50-59 year-old group with roughly 70% for the former and over 60% for the latter. It was accompanied by age group 18-24 at around 70% and 68% for men and women respectively. In contrast, the figure of 16-17 and over 60 year-old women outnumbered that of men, which constantly accounted for the lowest numbers.
Meanwhile, regarding employment rates by their youngest child’s age, the number of people without children shared the equal percentage of over 75%. In terms of men having under 5 to 18 year-old children, the figures were at the same percentage of about 90%, which consecutively constituted the largest numbers. Concerning female employees, the percentage of age group 16-18 was at 80%, which was the highest score, followed by around 75% and 70% in age group 5-10 and 11-15 correspondingly. The smallest percentage was below 60%, which was represented by under 5 year-old group.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-09 | Estriper | view |
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying 78
- the maps show changes between 1960 and now in the station street 84
- The chart below shows the percentages of both males and females who ate 5 kinds of fruits and vegetables per day in the UK in 2006 78
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Music has been and will continue to be the universal language of mankind To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, while, except for, in contrast, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93852459016 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74423426254 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504098360656 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.1211212193 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.888888889 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1111111111 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172656133519 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822802031833 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060273519498 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130582041745 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626566404366 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.