The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010.
The bar chart compares six different nations in terms of the oil manufactured ability from 1990 to 2010.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that Saudi Arabia was the largest oil produced country, the opposite was true for Qatar. Additionally, the amount of oil created in all countries increased excepting for Qatar.
In 1990, over 8 million barrels of petroleum made in Saudi Arabia, compared to about 3 million casks in Iran. Meanwhile, the quantity of oil produced in Iraq, Kuwait and UAE did not much difference, at roughly 2 million cylindrical containers each. By contrast, there were only about 0.4 million casks manufactured in Qatar. In 2000, while the oil production capacity of UAE remained unchanged, but the other territories experienced a slight growth in their figures.
Over the decade ensuing, marginally more oil was made in Iran and Iraq as illustrated by rises to around 4 million barrels respectively, whereas the figures for Kuwait and UAE reached well under that amount. By contrast, Saudi Arabia witnessed a terrible increase in the quantity of oil production to over 14 million casks, whilst Qatar's data still stayed extremely low at under 0.5 million cylindrical containers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-05 | jadenguyen | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-10 | hnhung | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-06 | Sanaullah97 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-06 | Sanaullah97 | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-25 | vivitoben | 84 | view |
- In some parts of the world it is increasingly popular to research the history of one s own family Why do people want to do this Is it a positive or negative development 84
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaur dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 82
- The chart below give information about the highspeed continuous internet connection of households in five countries in 2001 and 2002 92
- As life expectancy is increasing people work after retirement with pay Alternatively some people start to work at a young age Are these positive or negative impacts 89
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, still, well, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18274111675 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8350878661 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624365482234 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4672163884 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.444444444 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180558766768 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782905494407 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489182835358 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117105798849 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349077183235 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.