The graph shows the percentage of UK adolescents following a vegetarian diet.
The line graph represents the fraction of adherents to the vegetarian diet among the UK’s youth between 1960 and 2020.
Overall, despite periods of fluctuations, the popularity of vegetarianism rose during the six decades surveyed.
Going into more detail, from 1960 to 1980, there was a constant rise in the percentage of vegetarian diet followers within UK’s adolescents, and by 1980, vegetarians took up more than one-eighth of the country’s young population. Contrastingly, the 80s and the early 1990s saw a sharp decline in the adoption of vegetarianism, halving to approximately 7% in 1993. The rest of the 90s witnessed erratic development, with 2000 recording only one in twenty British young people excluding meat and fish in their diets.
In comparison, the figures 2000s and the 2010s observed increased stability. More specifically, during the 2000s and early 2010s, the fraction of vegetarians in the UK’s youth grew consistently, reaching 10% in 2011, and stabilizing around this mark throughout the 2010s. Forecasts for 2020 suggests that the percentage of vegetarians among the adolescents of the United Kingdom will remain at 10 percent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-03 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the average number of Vietnamese students studying in France, Russia and America between 2000 and 2015. 73
- The first graph below shows the weight in tonnes of fruit produced by a farm during each month in 2013 and also the amount in tonnes of fertiliser used The second graph shows the volume of rainfall in each month in millimetres 89
- Many things can influence the academic achievement and emotional growth of a student In this regard beers have more of an impact that teachers do To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 79
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 75
- The graph below shows the usage of oil in four different countries between 1996 and 2006 as a percentage of total energy use within each nation 69
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59116022099 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19628420447 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646408839779 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0416485979 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 5.23603664747 14% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2754219785 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947157192155 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932688378881 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14814923195 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641293979118 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.