The line graph illustrates the amount of elderly population aged over 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries(USA, Sweden, and Japan).
Overall, the population in the United States of America soared at the beginning of the period, while Japan at its low. The population in the USA would be experiencing some fluctuations in the middle of the term, hence outnumber by Japan.
In 1940, the United States of America and Sweden had a fewer percentage of differences. While the former was closer to 10% of the population aged 65 and over, later was about 6%. After two decades, the population of elderly begun to rise in both the countries of USA and Sweden. After the year 1980, the USA witnessed a downward trend in their elderly population, however, Sweden continued to grow and peaked at 20% in between 2000 and 2020. Following the year 2020, both countries would continue to grow up to the end of the period.
On the other hand, Japan's population aged 65 and over was approximately 5% in the year 1940. However, its population hit a low for about five decades. Nevertheless, Japan managed to rise in the term period. Furthermore, the elderly population of Japan will take over the population(aged 65 and over) of both the countries of The United States of America and Sweden by the year 2040.
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 86
- It is often thought that the increase in juvenile crime can be attributed to violence in the media. What do you think is the reason for a growth in the rate of juvenile crime? What solutions can you offer to deal with this problem? 73
- The graph shows the proportion of population aged 65 and over between 1940and 2040 in three different countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Describe the diagram about the hydroelectric dam 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1099.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8201754386 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74958725462 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473684210526 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 340.2 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9130923778 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5833333333 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175426480612 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729631543255 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890795840673 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143969356508 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106005474611 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.