The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph demonstrates the number of underground station passengers in London by time period from 6.00 to 22.00.
In 16-hour period, the number of tube passengers fluctuated dramatically. There were 2 times reaching to the highest point at 400 passengers using the underground and dropped to the lowest of 100 users.
The number of people approaching the train station rose up 300 persons reaching the maximum at 400 persons at 8 a.m. In the same way, metro passengers increased tremendously from 16.00 to 18.00 reaching the 2nd highest rate at 380 passengers.
On the other hand, the underground station passenger number had a drop down from the both highest rate of the day. Passengers attending the rail station decreased from 400 to a bit under 200 in 2 hours at 10.00 a.m. At 20.00, the number of passengers also lowered significantly to about 120 from almost 400. There was another significant decrease at 16.00 which the number of tube passengers dropped from 300 to the lowest point of 100 people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | kaka singh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | benj212 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | gulbakhyt_90 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | tranhien297 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | aria etemadi | 73 | view |
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think that taxation should be able to keep to a minimum as the money people earn should be theirs to do with as they wish Others believe that people should pay a significant level of tax in order to support the public services we all depend on 72
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about the consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city centre from 2003 2012 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78478033944 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53216374269 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9725202116 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.142857143 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167730063116 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106966031786 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560702806138 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132051541953 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599393050716 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.