The bar charts illustrate the proportion of computer ownership both in general and educational level. The above charts range from the time period of 2002 up to 2010 while the below one focused in the years 2002 and 2010 only.
Overall, the total percentage of computer ownership increase steadily. On further inspection onto the educational levels, most computers are used in students with postgraduate qualification while the least are in the ones that no high school diploma.
Since 2002, the percentage of computer ownership started out at 55% in 2002 before the figure rose up to 57%,60% and 63% during 2004,2006, and 2008 respectively. In 2010, it has reached its peak at over 70%.
On the educational scale, postgraduate students tend to have the largest control over computers comparing to other levels with the enormous proportions of 70% and 90% in 2010.Other students that received a similar amount of ownership are one that finished college and got a bachelor's degree with the percentage around 50-60% in both the years. In contrast, students with only high school diploma or none of the above certificate have a chance of computer ownership at around the maximum percentage of 60% in 2010 while the lowest is at 40%.
- the graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010 and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comp 84
- The diagram below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave energy machine and its location Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the production and processing of milk and dairy products for commercial sale Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Other
...mous proportions of 70% and 90% in 2010.Other students that received a similar amount...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06862745098 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77062708991 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.2077261485 43.030603864 203% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 129.25 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252106431867 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119243692177 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557500176258 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165306258738 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691943316554 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.