The tables illustrate the data regarding fairtrade-labelled coffee and banana sales in five European nations in 1999 and 2004. Sales measured in euros.
As the tables outline, almost in all given countries, coffee and bananas' sales increased significantly in the final year, except Sweden and Denmark, where banana sales outperformed in the initial period.
As per coffee sales, in 1999, Switzerland represented 3 million euro sales, which was doubled after five years. Similarly, the UK's trade accounted for 1.5 million in the initial year, and it grew nearly 20 times in the final year, with figure 20 million. While Denmark's sales raised to 0.2 million from 1.8 by 1999, sales for Belgium increased by 0.7 million by 2004 from 1 million in 1999. Just 0.2% increment was seen in Sweden in the final year.
In terms of Banana sales, Switzerland's sales more than tripled in 2004 from 15 million in 1999, whereas UK's one increased by five times from 1 million euro to 5.5 million, at the same time, Belgium sales shoot up 3.4 million from 0.6. Conversely, Sweden's banana sales dropped by 0.8 million, on the other hand, Denmark sales too dropped by around 1 million from 2 million in the beginning period.
- The diagrams below show UK students responses to the question of to what extent would they describe themselves as financially organised Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Being a celebrity such as a famous film star or sports personality- brings problems as well as benefits.Do you think that being a celebrity brings more benefits or more problems? 61
- The chart below shows information about the challenges people face when they go to live in other countries.. 78
- Industrial pollution is increasing all around the world Some people say that the most effective way to tackle the problem is to Tax companies that are causing the pollution Others argue that there are other ways to control the situation Discuss both views 50
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the initial year, and it grew nearly 20 times in the final year, with figure ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, regarding, similarly, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95098039216 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58543000082 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544117647059 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 106.194323648 43.030603864 247% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 126.25 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241774226508 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139917962599 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149868586619 0.0843802449381 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218604030484 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148661610966 0.0819641961636 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.