Line graph
The line graph illustrates the information about the number of visitors visited the Caribbean island in between 2010 and 2017. However, graph also shows that visitors like to stay on cruise ships or on island.
Firstly, in 2010, 0.25 million visitors liked to stay on cruise ship but the number peaked to 0.5 in 2011. After then, number of visitors went down to again 0.25 million in 2012 while, after 2012, number of visitors for this category gradually increased to 2 million in 2017. Moreover, 0.7 million tourists liked to stay on island in 2010 and 2011 whereas, sudden rose can be seen number of tourists and went up to 1.5 million in 2013.
Secondly, 1 million tourist visited Caribbean island in2010 and gradually increased till 2015 and reached to nearly 2.7 million but the visitors were same for the year 2016. Furthermore, visitors sudden rose to 3.5 million in 2017.
Overall, visitors liked to stay on cruise ships rather than on island. It can be seen from the graph that numbers of visitors had been increased over the 7 year period.
- Line graph 61
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- Line graph 61
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78571428571 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31558696707 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505494505495 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.976958295 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7777777778 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2222222222 5.23603664747 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101377693064 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600829360278 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0962058367887 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945264021224 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119752048907 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.8 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.