Line Graph
The line graph provides the proportion of tourists visiting Scotland to see the aquarium, castle, zoo, and festival in Edinburgh between 1980 and 2010. It is evident that the least popular show in 1980 was the zoo while the aquarium became the lowest visited place in the next 30 years.
During the 1980s and 1990s, there was a sharp increase in visitors to the castle from approximately 24% to 45%, followed by a gradual drop to 31% in 2010. The same trend was found in the aquarium that the number of travelers increased sharply from 20 % to 35% between 1980 and 1985, continued with the rapid decrease in 1990 and remained less than 10% in the next 20 years.
The inhabitants who visited the festival fluctuated slightly in those periods, remained about 20% at the end. Moreover, visitors to the zoo also showed a fluctuation line and rose significantly from 10% to 20% between 2000 and 2010
- the number of viewers who enjoy sporting programs in particular countries (Australia, The UK, The USA, and Canada). 89
- the three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000 78
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. 73
- The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and present. 61
- Nowadays children are experiencing increased educational, social, and commercial pressure. What is the cause of this effect? What is a solution to reduce the pressure? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 741.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71974522293 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52061680012 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605095541401 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0970875651 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112023858061 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613332589432 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0971267760598 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0781955556247 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658526314363 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.