The line graph compares three different countries in terms of exporting coffee in 2002 and 2012.
Overall, all three countries amount of coffee export increased in the time period with some fluctuations.
As per the graph shows, Brazil’s coffee export figure stood at nearly 12 million KG. This figure then gradually increase over eight years period of almost 20 million kg in 2008 before going down to around 18 million in 2010. The quantity for coffee export of brazil reached a peak of 25 million kilograms in 2012.
Regarding Costa Rica’s export, they shipped exactly 15 million kg in 2002, which was followed by a sharp decline to approximately 7 million in 2006. However, It climbed up progressively from 2006 and hit exactly 20 million at the end of the period in 2012. By contrast, in 2002, 5 million coffee was exported from Colombia. Over the following four years, it rose to 12 million. Next, the amount of coffee export plunged to a low of nearly 3 million in 2006. 2008 to 2016 witnessed a rocketed growth at the end of the period and hit exactly 15 million in 2012.
- Modern technology is now very common in many work places How do you think this has changed the way we worked Do you think there are disadvantages to reply too much on technology 61
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The line graph below in the amount of coffee exported from three countries between 2002 and 2012 54
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 73
- Modern technology is now very common in many work places How do you think this has changed the way we worked Do you think there are disadvantages to reply too much on technology 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81578947368 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6018371945 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557894736842 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.6990914909 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1818181818 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2727272727 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315509891367 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154458984593 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148135113445 0.0843802449381 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27043544136 0.15604864568 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.161270599105 0.0819641961636 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.