The line graph below shows the consumption of 4 kinds of meat in a european country from 1979 to 2004
The line graph shows information about the amount of chicken, beef, lamb and fish eaten in a European country. The period begins in 1979 and ends in 2004.
Overall, chicken was the most popular meat consumed over the period. It began at quite a low level - around 150 grams per person per week - but recorded a strong upward trend, finishing at 250 grams per week.
From 1979 to 1984 beef showed a generally upward trend and was the most popular meat consumed (around 230gpw). However, from around 1987 to 2004 there was a strong, fluctuating downward trend – falling from around 230gpw to 120gpw. Although beef was more popular than lamb, lamb showed a similar decreasing, fluctuating trend – falling from around 150gpw in 1979 to around 60gpw in 2004.
Fish started at around 60gpw in 1979 and remained stable throughout the whole period – finishing at around 40 grams per week in 2004.
In summary, it is clear that chicken was the most popular meat consumed followed by beef, lamb and fish.
- The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods in britian. 67
- The diagrams below guve information on transport and car use in edmonton. 73
- Parents are the best teachers. Do you agree or disagree. 73
- Do children behave better when tvey are punished or rewarded 89
- The chart below show the methods of transportation for people travelling to one university for work or study in 2004 and 2009. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84393063584 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23953347912 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537572254335 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 212.4 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.516533602 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1111111111 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200591647311 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103131363834 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625358215227 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114810229011 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0912592429989 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.